Network Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion
نویسنده
چکیده
The Supreme Court’s Brand X decision has reignited the debate over “network neutrality,” which would limit broadband networks’ authority to impose restrictions on end users’ ability to access content, run applications, and attach devices and to charge content and application providers higher prices for higher levels of quality of service. In this Article, Professor Christopher Yoo draws on the economics of congestion to propose a new analytical framework for assessing such restrictions. He concludes that when transaction costs render metering network-usage uneconomical, imposing restrictions on bandwidth-intensive activities may well enhance economic welfare by preventing high-volume users from imposing uncompensated costs on low-volume users. Usage of bandwidth-intensive services can thus serve as a useful proxy for congestion externalities just as port usage served as a proxy for consumption of lighthouse services in Coase’s classic critique of the economic parable of the lighthouse. In addition, content delivery networks and other commercial caching systems represent still another innovative way to manage the problems associated with congestion and latency that would be foreclosed by network neutrality. Furthermore, allowing network owners to differentiate their services can serve as a form of price discrimination that can mitigate the sources of market failure that require regulatory intervention in the first place. This framework suggests that broadband policy would be better served by embracing a network diversity principle that would eschew a one-size-fits-all approach and would allow network providers to experiment with different institutional forms until it can be shown that a particular practice is harming competition. At most, concerns that telephone companies may prevent end users from using their digital subscriber line (DSL) connections to access Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) provide support for targeted regulatory intervention. They do not justify a blanket prohibition of end user restrictions that network neutrality proponents envision.
منابع مشابه
Congestion measurement in data envelopment analyses under weak disposability of desirable and undesirable outputs in a Two-phase Network
Congestion is one of the main issues in data envelopment analyses which have particular importance. Recently researches about congestion, whether in economic articles or in Operations Research articles in had grown increasingly. Congestion is a wasteful stage of the production process where outputs are reduced due to excessive amount of inputs. In economics, congestion is very important because...
متن کاملNetwork Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers: Implications for Content Variety, Broadband Investment, and Regulation
متن کامل
Network Neutrality and Congestion Sensitive Content Providers
We study departures from network neutrality through implementing a Quality of Service tiering regime in which an ISP charges for prioritization on a non-discriminatory basis. We find that Quality of Service tiering may be more efficient in the short run, because it better allocates the existing network capacity, and in the long run, because it provides higher investment incentives due to the in...
متن کاملInnovation through discrimination!? A Formal Analysis of the Net Neutrality Debate
We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with network congestion sensitive content providers and Internet consumers on each side, respectively. The platform is controlled by a monopolistic Internet service provider, who may choose to sell content providers prioritized access to its customers. We explicitly consider the adverse effects of traffic p...
متن کامل1 Network Economics: Neutrality, Competition, and Service Differentiation
In 2007 Comcast, a cable TV and Internet Service Provider in the United States, began to selectively rate limit or " shape " the traffic from users of the peer-to-peer application Bit Torrent. The access technology that Comcast uses is asymmetric in its capacity-the " uplink " from users is much slower than the " downlink. " For client-server applications like web, this asymmetry is fine, but f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006